Common Mistakes to Avoid When Submitting IGNOU Synopsis for Approval

Submitting your IGNOU synopsis is a crucial step in your academic journey, but many students commit mistakes that lead to delays. This comprehensive guide highlights the most common mistakes and how to avoid them when submitting your synopsis for approval.

1. Formatting Errors

These layout mistakes often lead to immediate rejection:

• 
  
• Incorrect Font Usage: Not using Times New Roman in 11pt size
  
• Spacing Issues: Ignoring double spacing requirements
  
• Margin Problems: Using margins smaller than 1 inch
  
• Page Limit Exceeded: Going beyond 10 pages
  

2. Content-Related Mistakes

Substantive errors in your synopsis content:

1. 
   
2. Vague Research Objectives: Broad study goals that lack focus
   
3. Poor Literature Review: Outdated references and citations
   
4. Methodology Flaws: Inappropriate research methods
   
5. Expected Outcomes: Missing projected results
   

3. Guide Communication Errors

Mistakes in consulting your guide:

• 
  
• Late Submission: Sharing draft after deadline
  
• Ignoring Feedback: Not incorporating guide's suggestions
  
• Missing Signatures: Submitting without proper approvals
  
• Communication Gaps: Not regularly updating your guide
  

4. Technical Submission Mistakes

Errors in the upload procedure:

For Online Submissions:

• 
  
• Uploading unreadable files
  
• Exceeding file size restrictions
  
• Incorrect file labeling
  

For Physical Submissions:

• 
  
• Poorly organized copies
  
• Missing cover page
  
• Submission to incorrect department
  

5. Citation Blunders

Common academic writing mistakes:

• 
  
• Inconsistent Style: Mixing MLA formats randomly
  
• Plagiarism: Copied content without attribution
  
• Incomplete References: Missing publication dates
  
• Over-reliance: Too many internet sources
  

6. Scheduling Mistakes

Poor time management errors:

1. 
   
2. Starting synopsis at last moment
   
3. Not accounting for guide's review time
   
4. Missing submission dates
   
5. Underestimating revision time
   

7. Professionalism Errors

Mistakes that appear unprofessional:

• 
  
• Grammatical errors throughout text
  
• Poor formatting across sections
  
• Illegible corrections on final copy
  
• Missing table of contents
  

8. Verification Before Submission

Essential verification steps:

9. What Evaluators Look For

Understanding what guides typically reject:

• 
  
• Lack of originality in research idea
  
• Overambitious research scope
  
• Poor alignment with program objectives
  
• Inadequate methodological foundation
  

10. Corrective Measures

How to prevent these mistakes:

1. 
   
2. Start early of deadlines
   
3. Create multiple drafts for review
   
4. Use IGNOU Synopsis Writing Service's sample synopses
   
5. Seek peer review
   
6. Verify all guidelines twice
   

11. After Rejection

Steps to take if your synopsis gets rejected:

• 
  
• Carefully review correction notes
  
• Consult your department head
  
• Make targeted improvements
  
• Resubmit within stipulated time
  

12. Best Practices

Positive actions to impress evaluators:

• 
  
• Demonstrate depth of topic
  
• Show feasible research methodology
  
• Highlight social significance
  
• Present professional documentation
  

Conclusion

Avoiding these common mistakes will significantly increase your chances of synopsis approval. Remember that your synopsis is the blueprint for your entire research project - investing time to get it right initially will save you from problems later. Always consult your guide and follow IGNOU guidelines meticulously for smooth approval.

Wishing you success with your synopsis submission!